01/22/2026 • by Jonas Kellermeyer
Innovation Partnerships: Today They Are More Important Than Ever
Innovation is often conceived of and approached as a project. With a clearly defined timeline, a clear methodology, and the implicit desire to be able to present a solution at the end, most organizations under pressure to innovate embark on such processes. What is frequently overlooked, however, is that many of the challenges organizations face today cannot be solved through a project-based logic at all. They are too complex, too systemic, and require a more long-term strategic approach. This is precisely where the relevance of innovation partnerships begins.
Why Traditional Innovation Projects Are Increasingly Reaching Their Limits
Innovation projects usually follow a familiar logic: define the problem, select a method, develop solutions, present results. This structure works well as long as the problem is clearly defined and the conditions remain stable. In practice, however, this is increasingly rarely the case. Organizations are confronted with parallel challenges:
- technological uncertainty (e.g., AI, automation),
- organizational friction,
- regulatory dynamics,
- contradictory stakeholder interests.
In such contexts, isolated innovation projects often generate insights, but rarely succeed in creating lasting impact.
Innovation therefore does not fail because of a lack of ideas, but because of insufficient continuity and the pressure of the contemporary time regime.
What Fundamentally Sets Innovation Partnerships Apart
Innovation partnerships shift the focus and relieve pressure from individuals. The collaborative path follows a distinctly different trajectory: away from isolated measures and toward jointly defined learning processes.
The goal is not to deliver solutions as quickly as possible, but to build orientation, test hypotheses, and develop decisions step by step—while day-to-day operations continue in parallel.
An innovation partnership means:
- shared understanding instead of external recommendations,
- iterative research instead of one-off analysis,
- long-term impact instead of short-term results.
Innovation is therefore not simply purchased – it is developed collaboratively. This also leaves room for setting one’s own distinctive priorities.
Why Now Is Exactly The Right Time For An Innovation Partnership
Many organizations currently find themselves in a phase of disillusionment. The major innovation promises of recent years – from Design Thinking and agile transformation to the ubiquitous AI hype – have raised expectations that could only be partially fulfilled. This disillusionment is not a failure. It is part of a necessary maturation process. It creates the space to ask questions that truly point the way forward:
- What do we truly need in order to remain innovative?
- Which capabilities are we systemically lacking?
- Where do we need long-term sparring partners instead of short-term impulses?
Innovation partnerships provide an answer to precisely these questions.
When Innovation Partnerships Are Particularly Valuable
A simple answer to the implicit question might be this: if you are urgently searching for new perspectives that can give you a competitive advantage, then the time has come to consider getting involved in an innovation partnership. From our experience, innovation partnerships are particularly effective when:
- problems are not yet clearly defined,
- technological possibilities and organizational reality are (far) apart,
- innovation initiatives fail to scale despite appearing promising in principle,
- orientation is more important than speed.
In short: whenever traditional project-based approaches fall short, it is highly advisable to turn to proven experts within the framework of an innovation partnership.
With our in-house R&D Lab, we have created a domain that is specifically dedicated to embracing this long-term logic.
The Role of External Partners Is Being Fundamentally Rethought
The external partner in an innovation partnership is neither a mere service provider nor a methodological facilitator. Their role is fundamentally different:
- critical sparring partner,
- research-based observer,
- translator between strategy, technology, and use,
- advisory & consulting authority.
Taking on such a role requires trust, openness, and a willingness to tolerate a certain degree of uncertainty.
Innovation partnerships do not succeed despite a certain sense of uncertainty, but precisely because of it.
Conclusion: Innovation Partnerships Are Worth Being Considered
Innovation partnerships are not a panacea. They do not replace strategic responsibility, nor do they relieve organizations of making decisions. What they do provide, however, are the conditions under which good decisions can be made in the first place.
Especially in times of high complexity and low predictability, innovation partnerships are not a luxury, but a sensible response to structural, internal organizational overload.
Innovation requires less actionism and more shared responsibility. A partnership-based approach to innovation opens up the possibility of integrating new impulses into existing process routines quickly and pragmatically – thus laying the foundation for sustainable development.